Detailed introduction

Predatory Cities

I respectfully ask that you direct requests for discussions on this matter to the city law department." E-mail from Mike Duggan, Mayor of Detroit, to Bernadette Atuahene, Professor of Law, IIT, Chicago-Kent Coll. of Law (June 4, 2017, 16:31 CDT) (on file with author). Get price

Chicago

Your source for Chicago-Kent College of Law faculty news and publications Today IIT Chicago-Kent hosts the Supreme Court IP Review (SCIPR), a conference designed to provide intellectual property practitioners, jurists, legal academics and law students with a review of IP cases from the U.S. Supreme Court's previous Term, a preview of cases on the docket for the upcoming Term, and a Get price

Law Related Resources on the Internet and Elsewhere (1

The Internet EDGAR Dissemination project is a research project to investigate how such large data archives can be made easily available to the general public. The Internet EDGAR Dissemination project allows you to receive any 1994 filings to the Securities Get price

Miller v. California : definition of Miller v. California and

^ Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 36. ^ Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 27. Under the holdings announced today, no one will be subject to prosecution for the sale or exposure of obscene materials unless these materials depict or describe patently offensive 'hard Get price

Chicago

IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law is the new headquarters of the Oyez Project (), a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court of the United States and its work. The site aims to be a complete, searchable and authoritative source for all audio recorded in the Court since the installation of a recording system in 1955. Get price

This week's argument audio and transcripts now

The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent has posted audio and transcripts of this week's oral arguments. The Court heard arguments this week in: Astrue v. Capato Jackson v. Hobbs Miller v. Alabama Reichle v. Howards Southern Union Company v. United States Get price

Relevant Case Law

Relevant Case Law U.S. Supreme Court Cases Discussion of Recent Supreme Court Jurisprudence In the past five years, the Supreme Court has decided several cases on technological search and seizure. In United States v.Jones, decided in 2012, the Supreme Court held that the use of a GPS tracker to monitor the location of a vehicle constituted a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. Get price

Predatory Cities

I respectfully ask that you direct requests for discussions on this matter to the city law department." E-mail from Mike Duggan, Mayor of Detroit, to Bernadette Atuahene, Professor of Law, IIT, Chicago-Kent Coll. of Law (June 4, 2017, 16:31 CDT) (on file with author). Get price

The Constitutionality of Being Struck by Lightning

These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual. For, of all the people convicted of rapes and murders in 1967 and 1968, many just as reprehensible as these, the petitioners are among a capriciously Get price

Miller v. California

Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court modifying its definition of obscenity from that of utterly without socially redeeming value to that which lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. It is now Get price

Obscenity

Landmark Cases Set Precedence Two landmark cases have set the precedent for how the law has defined obscenity Roth v. United States (1957) Miller v. California (1973). These cases allowed the Court to "make it clear that obscene speech did not fall under the First Amendment" (Moore Murray, 2012, p. 439) and that the state must conform to a three prong test to find obscenity. Get price

What Is The Craig Vs Bonta Lawsuit

2009/10/9Craig V. Boren | The Oyez Project At IIT Chicago-Kent College Curtis Craig, a male then between the ages of 18 and 21, and a licensed vendor challenged the law as discriminatory. CRAIG v. BOREN, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Get price

This week's argument audio and transcripts now

The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent has posted audio and transcripts of this week's oral arguments. The Court heard arguments this week in: Astrue v. Capato Jackson v. Hobbs Miller v. Alabama Reichle v. Howards Southern Union Company v. United States Get price

The Constitutionality of Being Struck by Lightning

These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual. For, of all the people convicted of rapes and murders in 1967 and 1968, many just as reprehensible as these, the petitioners are among a capriciously Get price

Internet Sites for Streaming Video

Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law | A Multimedia Archive of the Supreme Court of the United States Multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court of the United States and its work. It aims to be a complete and authoritative source for all audio recorded in the Court since the installation of a recording system in October 1955. Get price

The Supreme Court and American Politics

Chicago-Kent College of Law 565 West Adams Street Chicago, Illinois 60661 Tuesday, October 17, 2017 Directions and Parking Contact: Colin Pochie | cklawreview.mekentlaw.iit.edu Download the Symposium flyer The Symposium is free, and lunch is provided Get price

City of Los Angeles v. Patel

Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a ninety-day period is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review. Get price

Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States, 565

Oyez Project: The Oyez Project, which came to Chicago-Kent in 2011, leverages information technology to make materials related to the Supreme Court instantly accessible around the world. The website,, which has tens of thousands of visitors a day, provides immediate access to nearly 10,000 hours of courtroom audio and is adding merits briefs and amici briefs to its already Get price

Miller v. California

Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court where the court redefined its definition of obscenity from that of utterly without socially redeeming value to that which lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or Get price

The Constitutionality of Being Struck by Lightning

These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual. For, of all the people convicted of rapes and murders in 1967 and 1968, many just as reprehensible as these, the petitioners are among a capriciously Get price

Chicago

Roger Rozanski has joined Chicago-Kent College of Law as the new director of the Chicago-Kent Patent Hub. Launched by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in 2011, the Patent Hub is one of 21 patent hubs around the country that were created under the America Invents Act to assist low-income inventors with the patent process and in securing patent protection. Get price

• Paul A. Morales Construction Inc • Norco • California •

CITY OF CHICAGO, Petitioner, v. Jesus MORALES, et al., Respondents. No. 97-1121. United States Supreme Court Respondent's Brief. October Term, 1997. Get the guaranteed lowest price on the Gibson 2012 Les Paul Studio Electric Guitar From studio artists Get price

Dred Scott v. Sandford Facts for Kids

Dred Scott v. Sandford KidzSearch Safe Wikipedia for Kids. Jump to: navigation, search 60 U.S. 393 (1857) was a United States Supreme Court landmark decision. [1] In March 1857 the court ruled that negroes descended from slaves, whether now free or slave . Get price

An Introduction to Climate Change Liability Litigation and a

In California v. General Motors Corporation, California sued several of the major automakers over the GHG emissions produced by vehicles they manufactured.17 California alleged that these pollutants were causing injury to the State, its coastline and Get price

Heller v. New York

Heller v. New York, 413 U.S. 483 (1973), was a United States Supreme Court decision which upheld that states could make laws limiting the distribution of obscene material, provided that these laws were consistent with the Miller test for obscene material established by the Supreme Court in Miller v. Miller v. Get price

This week's argument audio and transcripts now

The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent has posted audio and transcripts of this week's oral arguments. The Court heard arguments this week in: Astrue v. Capato Jackson v. Hobbs Miller v. Alabama Reichle v. Howards Southern Union Company v. United States Get price

Online customer service

Welcome ! If you have any questions or suggestions about our products and services,please feel free to tell us anytime!